Darebin Appropriate Development Association
Protect our community
Do you see breaches of Covid19 public health restrictions on construction sites in your neighbourhood?
Below are the stage 4 rules for small scale residential construction sites.
If you see the rules being broken you can call the police on the numbers below.
Show us how much you love Preston Market by chalking up the neighbourhood and posting it on the socials for Councilors and candidates to see. 
We want to congratulate Preston Market on it’s 50th Anniversary. We hope with all our hearts for another 50 years of successful trading, central to our diverse community.
A cautionary tale for those who seek to buy apartments off the plan.
DADA is very concerned about the rise of development applications that include green and sustainable features that fail to appear in the final building.
This problem is, in part, is due to failure of oversight by Councillors. Variations and amendments to the approved designs are decided ‘in house’ in the planning department alone. They are usually approved automatically and buyers, if not diligent only discover the missing green features, if they are lucky, just before they hand over final payment.
The article below mentions developments heartily supported by Darebin Councillors for their green credentials.
DADA would like to hear from anyone who has been a victim of ‘greenwashing’. Contact: Dada <darebinada@gmail.com>
There have been claims and counter claims about the decision made on the future of Preston Market at the council meeting on the 18th of May 2020.
In an attempt to get council to clarify their position regarding the demolition, shift and rebuild of the market DADA asked the following questions.
Read the council reply underneath and decide if Preston Market is still at risk of being demolished?
If you are concerned about the future of Preston Market tell your council representatives.
____________________________________________________
The Preston Market motion passed at the last council meeting (May 18) has created confusion and concern in the Darebin community about the fate of Preston Market.
For the sake of clarification will council please answer yes or no to the following questions:
Q. Does the motion passed keep open the option of demolishing, relocating and rebuilding the market?
Response
Council doesn’t get to make the decision on whether or not the market will move. That’s up to the State Government and the landowner. What Council can decide, is what it tells the VPA is most important to think about when they set the planning rules.
The advice we’ve had from experts is that there are real risks if the market is moved – particularly to the architectural heritage of the building which is very important. The advice also indicates real risks to the ongoing viability of the market and to the existing traders if parts of the market aren’t moved or expanded, which is also very important.
We haven’t given up hope that there’s a solution where all of these risks are balanced. Where both the architecture and the traders are protected. That’s what we asked the VPA to do on 18 May 2020, to protect both – and we called for both a heritage overlay and a contractual agreement with the landowner.
Q. Is relocating the Preston Market to a new position still one of the options being considered by council?
Response
Once the VPA comes to us with a plan, we will be able to say whether we think they go far enough to meet Council’s clear objectives to protect what’s most important. Council’s objectives are very clear that moving the market could only be supported if the heritage experts say that it won’t harm the heritage of the market building.
Councilors in the chamber have claimed that there are many views from the community that do not support the continuation of Preston Market in situ.
Q. Is this secret council business or will you release the data of Darebin community members who support the relocation, hence ultimate destruction/demolition of the market?
Response
All of the community engagement for Preston Market has been done by engagement specialists and their reports made fully public. The most recent round of engagement was carried out in May and June last year, by RPS Consultants. Issues around market character and urban design were looked at in-depth.
The report from this phase of engagement concludes: “Feedback also shows that maintaining the intangible essence of the market was an important consideration for participants. For the vast majority of participants these intangibles create the value of the market – this includes: the range and diversity of offerings, affordability, providing a welcoming and inclusive space that everyone can enjoy, having a range of stallholders, its cultural diversity and its authentic, ‘grunge’ aesthetic. For this majority the location of the market is not a concern.”
We also know that there are people within the community who passionately believe the market should remain exactly where it currently sits in the site.
Listen to the reasons given by Councilor McCarthy in the clips below for not supporting the amendments. You will hear that he wants to keep as many options open as possible. This includes the option of demolishing, moving and rebuilding the market regardless of it’s heritage status.
