• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About DADA
    • About DADA
    • Blog
    • Guide: Having Your Say
    • Gallery
    • Members
    • Signs
  • Friends
  • Members
  • Contact Us

Darebin Appropriate Development Association

Protect our community

  • News
  • Campaigns
  • Save Preston Market
  • Meeting Notes
  • Meeting
  • On Advertising
  • Objections

Save Preston Market

DADA and the Save our Preston Market Facebook

At the last DADA Executive meeting on June the 16th, 2020 DADA decided to formally cease to auspice the Save our Preston Market Facebook page.  We believe the page has been compromised to the extent that it no longer meets the DADA rules of membership and DADA Charter.  Membership has not been paid for a number of years.

DADA continues to work with many other community groups and individuals who are like minded and are working to save the Preston Market in situ with significant heritage features intact.

Preston Market Timeline 1970 – 2020

Preston Market has been under threat for many years.

This timeline aims to clarify the passage of key events in the fight to save Preston Market.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PRESTON MARKET TIMELINE 1970-2020 final

Preston Market Update: Council Meeting 9th June 2020

There have been claims and counter claims about the decision made on the future of Preston Market at the council meeting on the 18th of May 2020.

In an attempt to get council to clarify their position regarding the demolition, shift and rebuild of the market DADA asked the following questions.

Read the council reply underneath and decide if Preston Market is still at risk of being demolished?

If you are concerned about the future of Preston Market tell your council representatives.

____________________________________________________

The Preston Market motion passed at the last council meeting (May 18) has created confusion and concern in the Darebin community about the fate of Preston Market.

For the sake of clarification will council please answer yes or no to the following questions:

Q. Does the motion passed keep open the option of demolishing, relocating and rebuilding the market?

Response

Council doesn’t get to make the decision on whether or not the market will move. That’s up to the State Government and the landowner. What Council can decide, is what it tells the VPA is most important to think about when they set the planning rules.

The advice we’ve had from experts is that there are real risks if the market is moved – particularly to the architectural heritage of the building which is very important. The advice also indicates real risks to the ongoing viability of the market and to the existing traders if parts of the market aren’t moved or expanded, which is also very important.

We haven’t given up hope that there’s a solution where all of these risks are balanced. Where both the architecture and the traders are protected. That’s what we asked the VPA to do on 18 May 2020, to protect both – and we called for both a heritage overlay and a contractual agreement with the landowner.

Q. Is relocating the Preston Market to a new position still one of the options being considered by council?

Response

Once the VPA comes to us with a plan, we will be able to say whether we think they go far enough to meet Council’s clear objectives to protect what’s most important. Council’s objectives are very clear that moving the market could only be supported if the heritage experts say that it won’t harm the heritage of the market building.

Councilors in the chamber have claimed that there are many views from the community that do not support the continuation of Preston Market in situ.

Q. Is this secret council business or will you release the data of Darebin community members who support the relocation, hence ultimate destruction/demolition of the market? 

Response

All of the community engagement for Preston Market has been done by engagement specialists and their reports made fully public. The most recent round of engagement was carried out in May and June last year, by RPS Consultants. Issues around market character and urban design were looked at in-depth.

The report from this phase of engagement concludes: “Feedback also shows that maintaining the intangible essence of the market was an important consideration for participants. For the vast majority of participants these intangibles create the value of the market – this includes: the range and diversity of offerings, affordability, providing a welcoming and inclusive space that everyone can enjoy, having a range of stallholders, its cultural diversity and its authentic, ‘grunge’ aesthetic. For this majority the location of the market is not a concern.”

We also know that there are people within the community who passionately believe the market should remain exactly where it currently sits in the site.

Preston Market Update: Council Meeting 18th May 2020

Listen to the reasons given by Councilor McCarthy in the clips below for not supporting the amendments. You will hear that he wants to keep as many options open as possible. This includes the option of demolishing, moving and rebuilding the market regardless of it’s heritage status.

https://www.darebinada.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/McCarthy-1.mp4
https://www.darebinada.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/McCarthy-2.mp4

Dr Jane Stanley Presentation to Darebin Council

 

 

On Monday the 25th of May 2020 Dr Jane Stanley gave a presentation to Darebin councilors on ways of ensuring Preston Market’s viability without the need to demolish, relocate and rebuild.

Dr Jane Stanley is the Australian President of Eastern Regional Organisation for Planning and Human Settlements.  (That is eastern of the world, not just Australia or Victoria or Darebin.)

She has given DADA permission to post and share her powerpoint presentation.

You can read it here: Preston market presentation pp

 

Preston Market Update: 18th of May, 2020

DADA is extremely disappointed that council did not support the amendments to the motion on Preston Market.  We feel these would have helped tighten protections for the market and proved that council was not leaving open the option to demolish, move and rebuild the market.

If you listen to the reasons given by Councilors Amir and Newton for not supporting the amendments, in the clips below, you will hear very clearly that they want to keep as many options open as possible.

In our view that includes demolishing, moving and rebuilding the market on the Cramer Street side of the site.

https://www.darebinada.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Amir-1-with-comment-small.mp4
https://www.darebinada.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/newton-1-may-18-2020.mp4
« Previous Page
Next Page »